« Why the BeltLine needs to happen... | Main | Eden House gets a green roof »

Solar thermal for Eden House

We told you in a previous post about Eden House that the green roof wouldn't be limited to vegetation. As promised, the home now has a brand new Apricus solar thermal panel installed. Technically it's wall-mounted, but high enough to be part of the roof line. Architect David Butler also made sure the panel does double-duty as an awning over one of the windows, so it blocks the sun's summer azimuth and prevents solar gain inside the house.

The Apricus system uses evacuated tube technology mounted in an array on the southfacing wall to capture much of the day's sun as it tracks across the sky. The tubes have a liquid in them that is heated by the sun and transferred to the water heater in a continuous loop. In this fashion a significant portion of the home's energy requirements for hot water heating is off-set -- typically in the 50% - 80% range.

After HVAC, water heaters are the second largest consumers of energy in the home. And since sunshine is still free, the owners can enjoy protection from future energy shortages and/or price hikes.

Here's some pics of the installation with more views of the vegetative roof at no extra cost.

Posted on Tuesday, August 4, 2009 at 08:45PM by Registered CommenterBurke Sisco in , , , , | Comments8 Comments

PrintView Printer Friendly Version

EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (8)

Burke,

1st This is not a panel.Its 30 individual round evacuated glass tubes.(which passivly track the sun all day. . 2nd The tubes have heat pipes in them not liquid.
August 5, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterPaul Wood
Thanks for the corrections, Paul!
August 6, 2009 | Registered CommenterBurke Sisco
This building should be at least 65 to 70% more energy efficient in comparison to a conventional building. They will pay zero to heat water during the 8 months of "summer" in Atlanta and will pay 25 to 30% during winter months. It also has a live roof and will save a bunch in cooling and heating costs.They also have fantastic insulation. Whoever buys this home will a happy camper for a long time.Well done guys. Show off to the world that one can really reduce carbon foot print by just modifying our thinking and incorporate in daily living.Congrats Burke!
August 6, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDr.Jay
Burke

I have printed out 10 of your email postings for hand outs for tommorow's SART (sustainible Atlanta Round Tble meeting) AIA.This is my installation. I hope we can get our names and our beliefs out to the AIA, so they can include Solar or other alternatives into their building designs. By the way, great article. Paul Wood,
August 6, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterPaul Wood
Hi, Just curious,why did you choose the Apricus collector? Were evacuated tubes the best value for money given the high concentration of direct sunlight in Atlanta?
Thanks,
Kayla
August 8, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterKayla Ente
Hello Kayla,
This is David, architect for the project. We chose an evacuated tube collector because, based on initial cost and energy savings, it seemed like the kind of technology that would not only pay for itself but start to pay the purchaser. Dr Jay brought samples of the Apricus system to the office and made a convincing presentation. Paul, with Solar Smarts, carefully installed the system and returned to test and adjust it for optimum efficiency. Apricus is also certified for the tax rebates. I like the glassy black look of the tubes and the fact that each tube is a vacuum which, like a thermos, does a super job of keeping heat inside.
August 10, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterDavid Butler
Hi Burke,

Just wanted to say great job. I write an ecohomeblog out here in California, and just learned that Edison and First Solar are planning on building several Solar Farms out here in the desert. Everyone is starting to wake up to what needs to be done to make our world a cleaner place. Keep up the good work!
August 29, 2009 | Unregistered Commentergcastillo5665
I will be happy when this sort of green living becomes cost effective for the average homeowner. It's a shame that it still seems to be cost prohibitive for most of us unless you want to slog alone through a DIY project... I run a wildlife charity and they don't call it non-profit for nothing. I would give anything (except tons of cash that I don't have) to be able to get off the grid.
August 30, 2009 | Unregistered CommenterMonteen McCord

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.